vfd_v600), 39 pytest cases, and exact-rational certificates. Each paper claims a separate result; together they cover one mathematical object — the binary icosahedral group V600 = 2I — from four angles, then synthesise the shared spine.
The Five Papers
-
1Bekenstein 1/4 from V600 Coset IncidenceInside V600 = 2I, every coset of the binary dihedral subgroup Dic5 contains exactly 4 σ-fixed and 16 σ-mobile vertices. The arithmetic identity 4/16 = 1/4 reproduces the Bekenstein–Hawking entropy coefficient as a pure finite-group ratio — no fitting, no continuum approximation.→ Read Paper 1
-
2Discrete Hawking Quantum on V600A spectrum theorem on the mobile vertices: σ-pair excitations across the 96 mobile-vertex set yield a monochromatic energy Eq = 5/2 with a per-coset first-law identity relating temperature and entropy. Reported with explicit semiclassical-recovery sketch and stated cutoff.→ Read Paper 2
-
3Canonical τσ Involution from σ-Galois ProjectionPure mathematics, no physics claim. A canonical involution τσ on V600 = 2I, constructed via cycle-phase σ-Galois projection in the icosian trace metric. Fixes Dic5 pointwise, exchanges the K=52 and K=20 cycle classes within each non-trivial coset. Z25 = 32 canonical lifts.→ Read Paper 3
-
4(1 ± 1/12) Trace Ratios and the H0/S8 TensionsTwo rank-one K-class projector corrections on the 12-dimensional Tτ-cycle space: tr(I+P72)/12 = 13/12 and tr(I−P0)/12 = 11/12. As Layer-2 observation, 13/12×H0(Planck) lands at ≈0.06σ from SH0ES; 11/12×S8(Planck) lands within the KiDS-1000 multi-probe interval. The sign assignment is an explicit Layer-3 hypothesis.→ Read Paper 4
-
5Structural-Spine SynthesisA synthesis paper that imports the four prior results by citation only, names the shared structural tuple ΣV600 = (V600, Dic5, V24, τσ, K-multiset, Tτ-cycles), and proves that the four foundation theorems factorise through this common architecture. Records open prerequisites for a future CMB build.→ Read Paper 5
The Three Credibility Layers
The programme uses an explicit credibility scaffold so a reader can tell, at any line, what kind of statement is being made. The same vocabulary appears in all five papers.
Theorem-grade
Exact rational identities that follow purely from the K-multiset structure of V600. Proved with verification certificates in pure Python rational arithmetic. Independent of any cosmological or physical interpretation.
Observation
Numerical comparisons of Layer-1 trace ratios against published data (Planck 2018, SH0ES 2022, KiDS-1000). Reported with bibliography pinned, full asymmetric uncertainties stated, no goodness-of-fit claim made.
Hypothesis — not claimed
Coupling rules connecting Layer-1 mathematics to Layer-2 observation (e.g. H0 ↔ +P72, S8 ↔ −P0). Stated explicitly as hypotheses, falsifiable by future measurements, never as derivations.
Verification — Exact, Reproducible
- Pure Python standard library only — no NumPy, no SymPy, no float arithmetic anywhere
- Exact rationals throughout — the icosian ring ℤ[φ] arithmetic is implemented from scratch; trace identities resolve to exact ratios
- 39 pytest cases covering generators, coset structure, K-multiset, τσ lifts, and projector traces
- Five verification certificates (one per paper) totalling roughly 700 lines of code
- Shared library:
lib/vfd_v600/with quaternions, group construction, and operators
What Has Been Established
- The 4/16 = 1/4 incidence theorem on Dic5-cosets in 2I (Paper 1)
- The monochromatic Eq = 5/2 spectrum on the 96 mobile vertices, with a coset first-law identity (Paper 2)
- The canonical τσ involution with explicit Z25 ambiguity classification (Paper 3)
- The K-saturated rank-one admissibility theorem on the Tτ-cycle space, yielding the 13/12 and 11/12 trace ratios as the only such corrections (Paper 4)
- The structural-spine factorisation showing the four prior theorems share ΣV600 = (V600, Dic5, V24, τσ, K-multiset, Tτ-cycles) (Paper 5)
What Is Not Claimed
- That V600 is the unique substrate of any physical theory
- A unified physical theory of black holes, Hawking radiation, or cosmology
- That the Layer-3 sign assignment (H0 ↔ +P72, S8 ↔ −P0) is derived — it is an explicit hypothesis
- Pre-registered DESI/Euclid/eROSITA predictions (would require Layer-3 promotion to derivation)
- CMB acoustic-peak structure or recombination physics — named as an out-of-scope future build
- Cascade-unit to physical-unit calibration — tier-2 work, explicitly deferred
Five papers. One finite group. Exact arithmetic. Each layer of claim labelled and held to its own standard.