What this paper does. Defines a σ-pair excitation observable on the mobile-vertex set of V600 = 2I and proves that it has a monochromatic spectrum: every excitation carries energy Eq = 5/2 in the natural finite-group units of the construction. Per-coset, the spectrum closes into a first-law identity in which the σ-fixed count plays the role of entropy and the σ-mobile count plays the role of horizon channel content.
Epistemic status. A discrete spectrum theorem with a stated cutoff regime, not a derivation of physical Hawking radiation. We do not claim that V600 radiates, that the monochromaticity is unique to this group, or that the Planck-unit calibration is fixed. The semiclassical-recovery sketch is offered as a route, not a result.

The σ-Pair Observable

Within V600 = 2I, the σ-Galois involution partitions the 120 vertices into 24 fixed and 96 mobile (Paper 1). The mobile set carries a natural pairing under σ: each mobile vertex v sits opposite its σ-image σ(v), forming 48 unordered pairs. The σ-pair excitation observable measures the discrete energy carried by exciting one such pair.

Mobile vertex count

96 = 6 cosets × 16

From the Paper-1 incidence theorem, each of the 6 Dic5-cosets contains 16 mobile vertices, summing to 96 mobile vertices in total across V600.

σ-pairs

48 disjoint pairs

The mobile set is partitioned by σ into 48 unordered pairs {v, σ(v)}, each contained inside one Dic5-coset by the cosets' σ-stability.


The Spectrum — Monochromatic

Eq = 5/2   for every σ-pair
Across all 96 mobile vertices, the observable returns a single eigenvalue. The spectrum is not approximately uniform — it is exactly one value, in finite-group units.

The proof: write the observable in the basis of mobile vertices, evaluate the matrix element on each σ-pair, and use the Dic5-coset action to identify the value across cosets. The 5/2 emerges from the icosian trace structure inherited from V600 — not as a free parameter, but as a forced ratio in the underlying ring ℤ[φ].


The Cascading First-Law Identity

Within each coset, the count of fixed vertices (4) and the count of mobile vertices (16) combine with the monochromatic energy Eq = 5/2 to yield a closed identity in which the same arithmetic returns under variations of fixed-count or mobile-count:

ΔE = T · ΔS   (per-coset, discrete first law)
The relation closes inside one coset: the change in σ-pair excitation energy ΔE balances the change in fixed-count entropy ΔS against an effective temperature T fixed by Eq = 5/2 and the 4+16 incidence.

The identity is explicitly described as a discrete analogue of the black-hole first law, not as a derivation of Hawking's continuum result. The paper offers a semiclassical-recovery sketch — how the discrete arithmetic might project onto Hawking's continuum spectrum under a stated cutoff — but does not complete it. Full continuum recovery is named as out of scope.


What Lives in the Paper

In scope

Theorem-grade content

V600 setup, σ-pair definition, monochromatic spectrum theorem, per-coset first-law identity, PBH-style structural prediction at the discrete level.

In scope

Semiclassical sketch

A route from the discrete spectrum to a continuum analogue under a stated finite cutoff. Sketch only — not a recovery proof.

Out of scope

Continuum derivation

Planck-unit calibration, full semiclassical derivation of Hawking radiation, cosmology, τσ construction (Paper 3), QG-as-theory claims.


What Is Explicitly Out of Scope

  • Planck-unit calibration of the 5/2 to physical units
  • Full semiclassical derivation of Hawking continuum radiation
  • Cosmology, expansion rates, CMB — this paper is purely group-theoretic
  • The construction of the τσ involution (Paper 3 territory)
  • Quantum-gravity-as-complete-theory claims
  • Non-mobile-vertex excitations — the spectrum theorem is restricted to the 96 mobile vertices

Reviewer Risk Register

The paper enters its release with five anticipated objections each addressed by an explicit mitigation:

  • "The delta-function spectrum is unphysical." Mitigation: it is a finite-group spectrum, not a continuum density. Continuum recovery is sketched, not claimed.
  • "Why σ-pairs?" Mitigation: the σ-pairing is canonical — it is the orbit structure of the σ-Galois action on the mobile set. No alternative pairing is invoked.
  • "What sets the cutoff?" Mitigation: the cutoff is explicit and the paper does not pretend to derive it from internal structure alone.
  • "What is the role of W(H4)?" Mitigation: the underlying H4 Coxeter symmetry is recorded but not load-bearing in this theorem.
  • "How strong is the PBH prediction?" Mitigation: it is a structural prediction at the discrete level — not a quantitative astrophysical claim.

Verification

Reproduction

The certificate verify.py enumerates all 48 σ-pairs across the 6 Dic5-cosets, computes the σ-pair observable in pure Python rationals, and confirms the eigenvalue 5/2 across every pair. The first-law identity is checked per coset against the Paper-1 incidence counts. No floating-point arithmetic.


How Paper 2 sits next to Paper 1. Paper 1 establishes the Dic5-coset incidence: 4 fixed, 16 mobile, ratio 1/4. Paper 2 takes that mobile set as its phase space and proves the spectrum theorem on it. The two papers are mutually independent in their proofs but share the same finite-group substrate — together they form the structural side of what later papers in the programme reference as the "spectrum-of-V600 sector".

One observable. Ninety-six vertices. One eigenvalue. The arithmetic is exact; the continuum question is open.